Which attack method is NOT suitable when victims are still inside a burning building?

The indirect attack method involves applying water to a fire from a safe distance, often through the use of tools or equipment. This technique is typically employed in situations where there is minimal access to the building or when the fire needs to be cooled down before any entry is made.

However, when victims are still inside a burning building, the priority shifts to life safety. This means that reaching and rescuing victims becomes paramount, as they may be in immediate danger due to smoke, heat, or the fire itself. An indirect attack may not provide the adequate immediate control of the fire needed to ensure a safe rescue path for firefighters or to protect the victims from smoke inhalation or burns.

In contrast, a direct attack, combination attack, or ventilation attack may involve techniques that allow direct engagement with the fire while still facilitating lifesaving rescue operations. For instance, a direct attack focuses on combating the fire at its source, which is vital when there are people trapped inside. Ventilation helps to clear smoke and heat from a building, improving conditions for victims and firefighters alike. A combination attack employs both direct and indirect methods to maximize effectiveness while ensuring a safer environment for rescue efforts.

Ultimately, the indirect attack does not prioritize the immediate safety of victims and may not effectively